https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409355 Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to František Dvořák from comment #4) > > > 6) missing the "Provides: ruby-tcltk" > > > > > > There is comment about it, so it is probably OK a there is reason for it > > > (not full functionality provided by 'tk' gem?). I've noticed there is still > > > a TCL part available - at least the variable Tk::TCL_VERSION. > > > > The reason for this is that while I think (believe) ruby-tcltk functionality > > is fully provided by rubygem-tk, I am not sure at a moment. > > > > Let me know it if you think it is better to modify. Again sorry for long > > delay... > > Both packages looks identical (although I only compared list of ruby files > and symbols in native libraries and tested some demos). I don't think there should be "Provides: ruby-tcltk", since the library is on different place now (unless there is ruby- subpackage, as we used to provide, but I'm neither in favor of this idea). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx