[Bug 1422697] Review Request: resultsdb_conventions - Library defining conventions for ResultsDB results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422697

Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Review notes:

+ Package is named correctly
+ Package has license noted correctly and license file is installed
+ Subpackages are set up according to Python packaging guidelines
+ No issues from rpmlint or fedora-review
+ %check section has tests run that pass
! Unnecessary "rm -rf %{buildroot}" in %install (this isn't targeting EL5...)

It looks good to me. Drop the unnecessary command in %install mentioned above
and the stray comment on import.

A suggestion:

Tighten the "Requires: python2-resultsdb_conventions" to "Requires:
python2-resultsdb_conventions = %{version}-%{release}" so that they upgrade
together in lockstep. You don't have to, but I think it'd probably be a good
idea.

PACKAGE APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]