[Bug 225725] Merge Review: elinks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: elinks


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225725


bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |medium
           Priority|normal                      |medium
            Product|Fedora Extras               |Fedora

tyler.l.owen@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tyler.l.owen@xxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From tyler.l.owen@xxxxxxxxx  2007-07-21 11:03 EST -------
---------
Summary:
---------
* License file in tarball but not in %doc
* Duplicate BuildRequires: autoconf (by automake), krb5-devel (by
openssl-devel), pkgconfig (by libidn-devel) 

---------
Details:
---------

OK - Mock : Built on rawhide (x86)
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License is GPL
OK - License match packaging policy licenses allowed
FIX - License file is included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum:
a0eb50e18a2ac8e77d6b0df8f94bb5a6  elinks-0.11.3.tar.bz2
OK - Package has correct buildroot.
FIX - BuildRequires are not redundant.
OK - %build and %install stages are correct and work.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - No large doc files not in a -doc package
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories that other packages own.
OK - Changelog section is correct. 

OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should package latest version

---------------
Rpmlint output:
---------------
OK - silent on both srpm and main/sub package rpm

Silent on elinks and debuginfo

Source RPM:
W: elinks unversioned-explicit-provides webclient
W: elinks unversioned-explicit-obsoletes links
W: elinks unversioned-explicit-provides links


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]