[Bug 1409869] Review Request: perl-X10 - X10 perl module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409869



--- Comment #6 from Andrew Bauer <zonexpertconsulting@xxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Good question.
I treated those config files as sample templates and should therefore live
under the doc folder. I made that conclusion based on their content. Each
config file is site specific. A new config file must be written for each
application.

The two client/server binaries in this module are not used by ZoneMinder, which
of course is the purpose behind submitting this module for approval.

The pod text you see for x10server & x10client was actually written by me and
then submitted to the author. Since I've never actually used this module, I was
not able to give more detail than what you see.

I don't have a problem doing something different, but at the moment I can't
think of anything better to do. In my opinion including the binaries with
little documentation is better than excluding them, but I'm willing to
reconsider.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]