https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391444 --- Comment #13 from Javier Peña <jpena@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fedora-review has found a few issues: - boost159-static obsoletes boost-devel-static < 1.34.1-14, but it doesn't provide it (it provides boost159-devel-static). - same happens to boost159-mpich2, boost159-mpich-devel, boost159-mpich2-python. I guess we could remove all obsoletes to avoid issues with the main boost packages. - It has BR: python-devel, while it should be python2-devel - It doesn't like that libraries define an rpath, I'd need more information on this. - Some subpackages seem to be missing an ldconfig in %postin and %postun: boost159-openmpi, boost159-openmpi-python, boost159-graph-openmpi, boost159-mpich, boost159-mpich-python, boost159-graph-mpich As part of the SHOULD items: - There should be no %clean section in the spec The following are non-issues: - licensecheck is finding two GPL-licensed files, but those are covered by the special exception in the Bison license, so there is no issue there. - Header files in -devel subpackage are in an example, so expected. - Documentation is already in a -doc subpackage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx