https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410951 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- Group: System Environment/Libraries → unnecessary, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections. Especially in this case, "System environment" is pretty meaningless. (If it's necessary for EPEL, please disregard. I couldn't find anything in the EPEL-specific guidelines.) http://github.com/eliben/pycparser/archive/release_v%{version}.tar.gz → you could put #/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz at the end... rpmlint: python34-pycparser.noarch: W: no-documentation python34-pycparser.noarch: E: python-bytecode-inconsistent-mtime Dunno, looks bogus. I think all the general and EPEL-specific guidelines are being followed. + package name is OK + license is OK + P/R/BR look OK + builds and install in epel-7 mock OK + rpmlint doesn't seem to say anything useful Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx