https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418396 --- Comment #6 from Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jeremy Cline from comment #4) > the-new-hotness needs fedmsg to run it (it declares a moksha.consumer entry > point in its setup.py which is how fedmsg finds it) so it's not standalone, > exactly. On the other hand, I don't really see people importing it. Given > that, maybe getting rid of the prefix makes the most sense. Yeah, let's get rid out of prefix. (In reply to Jeremy Cline from comment #5) > When I don't have the prefix on the package name, is it still acceptable to > produce binary packages called python2-the-new-hotness and > python3-the-new-hotness? why would you do this? why not to put everything in main package and don't create subpackages? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx