Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From paul.horos@xxxxxxxx 2007-07-20 11:38 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > (In reply to comment #35) > I agree. I think the source should be named hylafax+<version>.tar.gz, too. Christoph, since you are in agreement with changing the name to hylafax+ and so is Lee: > My suggestion, Christoph, would be to see the HylaFAX+ vs. HylaFAX.org thing for > what it is, the usual forking arguments, and move past it so that we can get > this into Extras ... whether the ultimate package name be "hylafax" or "hylafax+". When do you think this will be done? We're looking at submitting HylaFAX for review but would like to clear up this confusion first. Thanks, Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review