Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nss_compat_ossl - OpenSSL to NSS porting library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248730 ------- Additional Comments From tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-20 05:18 EST ------- rpmlint -v nss_compat_ossl-0.9.1-1.src.rpm I: nss_compat_ossl checking W: nss_compat_ossl no-url-tag - as I suppose that upstream HTML pages (trac/wiki) is not yet created, please add URL: tag into spec file as soon as they are. rpmlint -v nss_compat_ossl-0.9.1-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm I: nss_compat_ossl checking W: nss_compat_ossl no-url-tag rpmlint -v nss_compat_ossl-devel-0.9.1-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm I: nss_compat_ossl-devel checking W: nss_compat_ossl-devel no-documentation - this is OK for now, as the docs (LICENSE, README) are in the base package, later developer docs and user docs should be split and developer docs should be installed into -devel subpackage W: nss_compat_ossl-devel no-url-tag rpmlint -v nss_compat_ossl-debuginfo-0.9.1-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm I: nss_compat_ossl-debuginfo checking W: nss_compat_ossl-debuginfo no-url-tag /usr/lib64/libnss_compat_ossl.la is included in the -devel subpackage, please remove it. As you're upstream maintainer - perhaps the COPYING file with GPL should be removed as the package is LGPL licensed (in LICENSE file) to prevent confusion? The file http://directory.fedoraproject.org/sources/nss_compat_ossl-0.9.1.tar.gz is missing on the server. The -devel subpackage probably should require the main package of exactly the same nvr and not >=? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review