Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpfr - A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248363 jakub@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? | ------- Additional Comments From jakub@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-20 04:24 EST ------- The mpfr library is released under LGPL2.1, how can saying it is GPL in the License tag be a "Good" thing? Of course you can relicense LGPL2.1 code as GPL, but why would you do that? License: LGPL would be much better (unless with the advent of GPL3, LGPL3, LGPL2.5 we start being more explicit and write GPL2, GPL2+, GPL3, GPL3+, LGPL2, LGPL2+, LGPL2.1, LGPL2.1+, LGPL2.5, LGPL3, LGPL3+ etc. in License tags. Also, upstream mpfr releases stable fixes on top of the last release as a cummulative patch, see http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/patches It would be good to apply this in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review