Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alliance - Alliance VLSI CAD Sytem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248649 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-18 05:37 EST ------- reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > 5 / desktop files > > * You missed > > Requires(post): desktop-file-utils > > Requires(postun): desktop-file-utils > > As agreed if MimeType key in desktop files is used, and will be using in the > next release. Actually, I mean "will _not_ be using". > > 11 / scriplets > > * %preun -p /sbin/ldconfig - This is unneeded > > * Recommand to have this if desktop file has a MimeType key. > > %post > > /sbin/ldconfig > > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : > > > > %postun > > /sbin/ldconfig > > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : > > Will use MimeType key Again, will _not_ be using. > > 15 / #Makefiles are present in alliance-examples/* > > * Is it possible to have another sub-package for these examples (which > will > > follow others rules of Requirement eventually ) > > * Having users to build them is %doc directory is not fair - Thoses can go > in > > %{_datadir}/alliance/examples. > > Ok, will be opting for a "alliance-examples" sub package. After a second thought, does it make sense to have a sub package ? I'll be leaving it in -doc package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review