[Bug 1407000] Review Request: python-pulp - LP modeler written in python

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1407000



--- Comment #4 from Dan Radez <dradez@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
I agree with you that I would prefer the lower case. The upstream appears to
use lowercase.

Though, there is already a project called pulp in fedora, dnf search pulp shows
a couple dozen hits.

While there is not an actual package called python-pulp is seems that it would
be confusing to the end user.

What do you think? Should I just make it python-pulp or should I make the
differentiation with python-PuLP?

I'm not sure I have a strong opinion either way, which is probably why it
mismatches in the spec name and package name now.

For now I'll go with you're recommendation on the lower case and if you think
otherwise I'll switch it back.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]