[Bug 1409363] Review Request: llvm3.9 -- Versioned LLVM 3.9

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409363



--- Comment #4 from Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan@xxxxxxx> ---
Kevin: I'm fine with going through a review, but I was told the contrary for
llvm3.7, and the rules at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Process
seem to imply otherwise. Maybe they could be made more explicit?

Orion: Thanks. These issues actually come from the original llvm .spec file.
I've also noticed another issue with Requires(posttrans) being repeated instead
of Requires(postun). All of them are fixed in the new version; they should be
added to llvm.spec too.

I've also disabled generating HTML docs: since the recent Sphinx update, the
build fails with obscure errors. This package isn't intended for general
development anyway, people would better use llvm for that.

Finally, I've added patches needed by Julia.

Spec URL: https://nalimilan.fedorapeople.org/llvm3.9.spec
SRPM URL: https://nalimilan.fedorapeople.org/llvm3.9-3.9.1-2.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]