[Bug 1370919] Review Request: python-pycryptodome - Self-contained Python package of low-level cryptographic primitives

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370919



--- Comment #7 from Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #6)
> There were a few concerning issues spotted:
> 
> python2-pycryptodomex.x86_64: W: pem-certificate
> /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Cryptodome/SelfTest/PublicKey/
> test_vectors/ECC/ecc_p256_x509.pem
don't think that it's problem
> python2-pycryptodomex.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
> /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Cryptodome/SelfTest/PublicKey/
> test_vectors/ECC/gen_ecc_p256.sh 644 /bin/sh
easy to fix
> python2-pycryptodomex.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter
> /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Cryptodome/SelfTest/__main__.py
> /usr/bin/env python
easy to fix
> python2-pycryptodomex.x86_64: E: non-executable-script
> /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/Cryptodome/SelfTest/__main__.py 644
> /usr/bin/env python
easy to fix
> python2-pycryptodomex.x86_64: E: backup-file-in-package
> /usr/share/licenses/python2-pycryptodomex/LEGAL/copy/LICENSE.orig
not a bug
> 
> Also, do you really need to add an "x" to the name of the package in the
> metadata? We don't have a pycryptodome module, and the package is already in
> the filesystem as pycryptodome, which is different from pycrypto.
Well, not sure. I just named it same as egg name...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]