https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398922 --- Comment #11 from Benjamin Kircher <benjamin.kircher@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Michael. Thank you for looking into this. > > * I think license is GPLv2+, not GPLv2 > > It's useless to write that without giving a rationale. > > Have you pointed "fedora-review -b 1398922" at this ticket yet to see which > test results it comes up with? Not sure if you asked Igor or me here (Igor, I presume). I don't want to get ahead of things here but anyway: Yes I did just now. rpmlint reports 3 errors (incorrect-fsf-address) and lots of warnings (partially useful) i.e., about those unversioned so-files in the package. For your convenience, please find results here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bkircher/uftrace-fedora/master/review.txt Things I should fix (I guess, waiting for input from you guys here): 1) These BR are not needed: gcc 2) Unversioned so-files not in -devel subpackage. Should we open a ticket with Fedora Packaging Committee as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages because of that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx