Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-15 18:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #52) > > I honestly don't understand the undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings. Is this > something that's apparently only happening on 64-bit? Yes, your guess was correct. (In reply to comment #53) > After making those changes here is the rpmlint output that I see on an x86_64 > system (I'll hang a new SRPM and SPEC file soon and will give the URLs here when > I do)... Make sure to include the following changes to fix the permission issues: 144,145c144,145 < %{_bindir}/* < %{_sbindir}/* --- > %attr(755,root,root) %{_bindir}/* > %attr(755,root,root) %{_sbindir}/* 171c171 < %attr(-,root,root) %{faxspool}/bin/* --- > %attr(755,root,root) %{faxspool}/bin/ > (Yet, I'm *still* not seeing any undefined-non-weak-symbol errors.) run "rpmlint hylafax" on the installed package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review