https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404421 --- Comment #9 from Jason Brooks <jbrooks@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Scherer from comment #6) > Other than this, they do look ok, even if I do not have enough knowledge > regarding the kubernetes parameters to see if the scripts are correct. I > also wonder if the proxy image shouldn't get more documention on how to run > it (IIRC? it is supposed to forward various ports around, so we need to use > -p, no ?) I've been adapting the ansible scripts from kubernetes/contrib to use these packages. I'm working in this fork: https://github.com/jasonbrooks/contrib/tree/atomic-update I found that I needed to add the -p 443 for the apiserver component, and the proxy component didn't need a similar change to work with these ansible scripts, but the scripts do handle firewall configuration. I've worked through some steps to run the node portion with package layering and the master parts in containers in this gist: https://gist.github.com/jasonbrooks/f1aa092e63edce5272451c5845f72750. I could look into what other changes might be needed to make that ansibleless method work with the kubelet and proxy in containers, too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx