https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #30 from Tim Fenn <tim.fenn@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #29) > (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #28) > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #27) > > > Created attachment 1221971 [details] > > > review log > > > > > > Package Review > > > ============== > > > > > > Legend: > > > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated > > > [ ] = Manual review needed > > > > > > > > > Issues: > > > ======= > > > > > > - ----> sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool <----- > > > > > > This commands does not work. > > > Try to set LDFLAGS="$RPM_LD_FLAGS -Wl,--as-needed" > > > > > > > Can't get this to work - part of the problem is many of these dependencies > > are pulled in using pkg-config, so there isn't a simple solution that I can > > think of/come up with. Any suggestions? > > > > Talking with upstream folks? Yes - they are aware of the issue and working on it (although given the way pkgconfig works, it may not be a straightforward fix?). I would imagine other fedora packages use this mechanism to remove unused-direct-shlib issues - is there a more general way to resolve this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx