https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402540 --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> --- Informal review: > License: [MPLv2.0](https://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/) Please use License: MPLv2.0 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Good_Licenses > # https://github.com/casperdcl/git-fame/pull/2 > Source1: LICENSE.txt > … > %files > %license LICENSE.txt It's not allowed to maintainers to add their own license. You should wait for upstream to properly add a license file. I'm not sure if it's allowed to redistribute MPLv2.0 without a proper license text bundled. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text > Requires: python3-setuptools Why need setuptools for runtime? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx