https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708 --- Comment #56 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Yunying Sun from comment #55) > (In reply to Josh Boyer from comment #54) > > (In reply to Dan Horák from comment #53) > > > Isn't this request a duplicate of > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/tss2/ ? > > > > Maybe... but I think it is a separate implementation of similar > > functionality? > It seems true to me, that it's separate user space implementations of TCG's > TSS > for TPM2.0. The functionalities and usage should be the same mostly, but > implementations are different. > > Intel's implementation contains 2 tools, the TPM2.0-TSS and tpm2.0-tools, > while IBM's solution is all in one package. > > @Jimmy, please do correct me if I misunderstood. > > > > > Vicky and Tomas the the review on tss2 and Yunying was also commented on it. > > They're all on CC for this one as well, so I think we can get that cleared > > up soon. > @Josh, What do you mean the "cleaned up"? Will this package have to be > rejected for Fedora due to existing approved tss2, or co-existing is allowed? Yes, they can co-exist in Fedora, but we need to be careful about things like file conflicts (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts). But I was mainly curious about the relationship between these two. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx