https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020 --- Comment #33 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #31) > Issues: > > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Apache (v2.0) BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or > generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 74 files have unknown > license. Detailed output of licensecheck in > /home/gil/1324020-cassandra/licensecheck.txt > > Apache (v2.0) BSD (3 clause) > cassandra-3.9/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/utils/vint/VIntCoding.java License fiels should be: ASL 2.0 and BSD Please, add also a comment, e.g.: # Apache (v2.0) BSD (3 clause): # ./src/java/org/apache/cassandra/utils/vint/VIntCoding.java License: ASL 2.0 and BSD > [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. > Please, remove useless: %{?scl:Requires: %scl_require rh-maven33} The "Requires" list is automatically generated. This entry, for me is useless. What is rh-maven33? why maven? why is necessary? Please, to explain in a comment in the spec file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx