https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400 --- Comment #13 from Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #10) > Neither is prohibited. Both are just guidelines stated as "SHOULD". Right, which is presumably why fedora-review doesn't object. I assume the guideline is against introducing underscores to separate name parts, not to expurgate them. > This > means that it's OK to deviate, if there's a good reason. The good reason is to spell the name correctly, regardless of capitalization. If I want to search the archive for what the author calls SuperLU_MT, I'd expect "repoquery --search superlu_mt" to find it, and it doesn't. Likewise for DL_POLY, which I lower-cased but spelt correctly (as a veteran of DL). > OK, so on second thought, consistency is more important. So "SuperLUDIST" > seems best, unless you want to rename the order two packages to "superlu-mt" > and "superlu". Renaming would of course be best in the long run. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx