[Bug 247515] Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-phar - Allows running of complete applications out of .phar files


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247515


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-07-12 23:34 EST -------
This looks mostly OK.  I guess it would be good to augment the PHP guidelines
with the extra bits like pecl module registration.

The spec doesn't use macros consistently.  In some places it uses %{__mkdir_p}
while others have "mkdir -p".  %{__install} needs to be used as well.

Since the only issue I can find is four commands that need to be converted to
macros, I'll go ahead and approve this and you can fix it when you check in.

Review:
* source files match upstream:
   83fad1a7946e8355aebf40e4928a2a6323c86f16df41ad9f67fa3b3852229fc8  
   phar-1.2.0.tgz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named.
X specfile does not use macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   config(php-pecl-phar) = 1.2.0-1.fc8
   phar.so()(64bit)
   php-pecl(phar) = 1.2.0-1.fc8
   php-pecl-phar = 1.2.0-1.fc8
  =
   /bin/sh
   /usr/bin/pecl
   /usr/bin/php
   config(php-pecl-phar) = 1.2.0-1.fc8
   php(api) = 20041225
   php(zend-abi) = 20060613
   php-bz2
   php-common >= 5.2.0
   php-hash

* %check is present and all tests pass:
   TEST RESULT SUMMARY
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------
   Exts skipped    :    0
   Exts tested     :   34
   ---------------------------------------------------------------------

   Number of tests :   97                95
   Tests skipped   :    2 (  2.1%) --------
   Tests warned    :    0 (  0.0%) (  0.0%)
   Tests failed    :    0 (  0.0%) (  0.0%)
   Tests passed    :   95 ( 97.9%) (100.0%)

* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets are OK (pecl module registration)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED, just fix the two "mkdir -p" and two "install" calls to be macros like
the rest of the spec.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]