https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389971 --- Comment #21 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ryan H. Lewis (rhl) from comment #20) > 1) Are PPC64 builds a necessity? > > Perhaps we can just file a bug for this and fix it later? Initial > investigation suggests its likely a toolchain issue. We need to run valgrind > on it simulating the ppc64 environment.. You need to build successfully your package on rawhide; then, fix issues on PPC or exclude these architectures temporarily and open a bug report (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Build_Failures). > > 2) We just releaseed Elemental 0.87 itself in the last 24 hours. > > I am now updating the spec to reflect that. It's probably best that we > package a released version of Elemental. > > 3) I've updated the licenses accordingly. > > 4) I'm not sure if there is a facility for a rawhide package that captures > the latest of master? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx