Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 ------- Additional Comments From faxguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-12 16:38 EST ------- I've fixed the rpath matter. (HylaFAX source-builds allow the user to specify a non-standard library location. If the user specified anything other than /usr/lib then rpath would be used for portability purposes. This didn't take 64-bit systems with /usr/lib64 into account, and so I've now modified the source repository upstream to not use rpath when /usr/lib64 is the library location. It will be in the next release.) I've moved the /usr/sbin/faxmail items to /usr/lib/fax/faxmail instead. I've removed the DSO symlinks and have linked against the versioned DSO files directly. I honestly don't understand the undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings. Is this something that's apparently only happening on 64-bit? I think that I've remedied the unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings. I'll have to double check that. More to come... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review