https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091 --- Comment #17 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Matthias Mailänder from comment #16) > If getting software into Fedora is such an bureaucratic, time-consuming and > laborious act, we could also collaborate together on a FlatPak/AppImage > bundle that works across distributions. > https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/issues/12257 > > I guess this task will fail anyway in the IP review as OpenRA relies a lot > on foreign intellectual property. Even though trademarks are avoided, the > code is a clean room implementation and most of the assets are hosted > separately on a community mirror server with silent approval from Electronic > Arts, I assume licensing and redistribution of files as in > https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/tree/bleed/mods/ra/bits are a real problem, > that has to be addressed first. IMHO, most of the bureaucratic issues came down to the strict no-bundling policy and a few other issues that have since been reworked and "loosened". Although in regard to the "foreign intellectual property", I can imagine you are correct, but I can't speak for the legal team. RPMFusion could be used to package this if legal rejects this, but with that said, I would still think that a FlatPak would be the easiest option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx