https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396139 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #3) > %if 0%{__isa_bits} == 64 or smth like this.. It's already using that, but the Neal concern is that 64Bit would be Intel specific. @Neal Looking at the code, I don't read that, looking at line 132 in fixed.h define a non asm version of mad_f_mul. Also it's mentioned that the 64Bit FPM should work as soon a a compiler has 64bit type. But my understanding is that it will not perform better if not a native 64bit arch. So using FPM=64bit seems a safe improvement over using ASM specific code on 64bit arches. That been said, FPM=Intel is indeed x86 asm specific. I've never tested that option. For arm, it's defined in line 253 and is asm specific. It's also advertised as performing better than FPM=64bit. I've only selected that option because it was worked on recently (on the referenced bug) and I've made a runtime test that it worked fine at the time I've bootstrapped RPM Fusion for arm. (was armv5tel and armv7hl at that time). Fixed the others issues locally. @Neal, any comment on the FPM option ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx