https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156 gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i | |t) | --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #1) > Generic: > [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets > other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging > Guidelines. > There is an upstream bug about the licensing, so most files are > "unknown". However the main license file agrees with the package > licensing. > > [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 36 > files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in > /var/tmp/1390156-jsonassert/licensecheck.txt > See above. Open https://github.com/skyscreamer/JSONassert/issues/70 for this problem (and also a PR), waiting upstream response ... (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #2) > Everything looks fine except for: > > [ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in > jsonassert-javadoc > > Could you check if this is a problem or not? I have no idea. This a "noarch" package. and use the _isa notation, in this case, that not make sense -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx