Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 ------- Additional Comments From jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-11 12:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Leaving the dist tag out of the changelog entry does not make rpmlint happy, > either. It will complain as long as the E-V-R of the package and the E-V-R of > the latest changelog entry do not match. I have to disagree with your. For demonstration please look at: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/pwsafe/pwsafe-0.2.0-0.2.fc7.src.rpm You will find out, that this source rpm makes rpmlint happy. > The secure ram warning is about mlock() (marking a part of memory unswappable). > mlock() requires root privileges. This seems to be used all over the place in > pwsafe, and I do not feel comfortable at all about letting this effectively run > as root. That is ok. It may be nice, if you can contact the upstream to make your improvements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review