https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1355592 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Broadly speaking, this seems fine, but one significant issue: the library package is shipping libvmi-0.11.so and libvmi.so. This seems wrong. If there's an expectation that multiple versions of the libvmi development environment should be parallel-installable, we should have libvmi-0.11.so.something in the main package and libvmi-0.11.so in the -devel package. If not, we should have libvmi.so.11 (or some other versioning) in the main package and libvmi.so in the -devel package. Raw .so files should not be in the main libvmi package. This is probably something that needs to be discussed with upstream - it's easier if we solve library versioning issues there. There's also the general concern over shared libraries calling exit(), but I think in this case it's reasonable (it's only in the safe_malloc() function). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx