https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 --- Comment #6 from Tim Fenn <tim.fenn@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5) > (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #4) > > > > > - doc sub-package isn't noarch > > > > > > > I didn't specify it as such? > > I don't see any 'BuildArch: noarch' line... > OK I'll have that fixed in the next build - sorry, I misread this the first time. > > > > New files: > > > > spec: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxOz1eBnQT3nOW9XWXZwNzhEY1U > > srpm: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxOz1eBnQT3nT2FJQjlhYXVTdDA > > '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' and 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' are used for epel5 only. > Is the %if 0%{?rhel} not sufficient around these statements? Or should it just be removed all together? > Why coot-1.spec ? > SPEC file must have same name of src-rpm. Doh, silly google drive renaming. I'll fix in the next upload. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx