[Bug 1380104] Review Request: python-backports-functools_lru_cache - A backport of functools.lru_cache from Python 3.3 as published at ActiveState

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380104



--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Issues:
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated". 7 files have unknown license. Detailed
     output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1380104-python-backports-
     functools_lru_cache/licensecheck.txt
 All source file are without license headers. Please, ask to upstream to
confirm
 the licensing of code and/or content/s, and add license headers


https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification

[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.

[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
    https://github.com/jaraco/backports.functools_lru_cache/issues

[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]