[Bug 1379094] Review Request: python-flit - Simplified packaging of Python modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379094



--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> ---
>  Most of the sources file are devoid of this information.
>  Please, contact upstream and ask to confirm the licensing of code and/or
> content/s, and add license headers

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/
LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification

Is still valid

(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #7)
> Looking at the source code of both upload.py and log.py, we can call it more
> of a fork rather than bundled really ... Even looking at history of the file.

This is a practice commonly used, to modify the original code to fit better for
their own purposes

Please, add:

this comment near to license field

# ./flit/logo.py  under ASL 2.0 license
# ./flit/upload.py under PSF license

and

# https://pypi.python.org/pypi/tornado
# ./flit/logo.py unkown version
Provides:    bundled(python-tornado)

> As for upload.py, it is *based* on python-distutils. Looking at the source,
> I do not *think* it is bundled here ... 
OK

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]