[Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine)


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199154





------- Additional Comments From ruben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-07-09 15:36 EST -------
Hello,

> See configure file for this.

You mean the PACKAGE_NAME?
The tarball is slony1-1.2.10.tar.bz2, the upstream project is called Slony-I, and the first line of the README file says Slony-I. From 
the NamingGuidelines:
When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came.

> Missing yacc parser.y parser.c
>> ? No idea what this means.
yacc is provided by bison, and seems to be used by Slony-I: http://www.gnu.org/software/bison/

> - Since postgresql_autodoc is now available, maybe you can add it to the BuildRequires
>> I don't think so. Is there anything that depends on autodoc?

configure is searching for it, so I assume it is used.

> Some people may skip doc builds.
But doc is a separate package in Fedora, and people can just choose to not install it.

> Slony looks for /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pg_config first. If someone has a source installation of PostgreSQL, then the build will break

This won't be a problem when the package is build on the Fedora buildservers. I understand that you want to maintain one upstream 
specfile for all versions of Red Hat and Fedora, but having a clean spec in Fedora makes things more easier in the long run.

A few other comments:

- Double BuildRequires for docbook-style-dsssl
- Is %kerbdir still needed? If not, there's no need to change CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and CFLAGS and a simple %configure will do.

And:

rpmlint of postgresql-slony1-engine-docs:
E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/support 0644
E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/adminguide 
0644
E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10 0644
E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/concept 0644
E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-1.2.10/howto 0644
E: postgresql-slony1-engine-docs non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/postgresql-slony1-engine-docs-
1.2.10/implementation 0644

Cheers,

Ruben





-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]