[Bug 1379090] Review Request: python-qtconsole - Jupyter Qt console

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379090



--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #7)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3)
> > > > Issues:
> > > > 
> > > > [?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> > > >      Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
> > > >      found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 47 files have unknown
> > > >      license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1379090-python-
> > > >      qtconsole/licensecheck.txt
> > > > 
> > > >  Some file report this license header: 
> > > >  "Copyright (c) Jupyter Development Team.
> > > >   Distributed under the terms of the Modified BSD License."
> > > >   but most of the sources file are devoid of this information.
> > > >   Please, contact upstream and ask to confirm the licensing of code and/or
> > > > content/s, and add license headers
> > > >  
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/
> > > > LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification
> > > >   https://github.com/jupyter/qtconsole/issues
> > > 
> > > I will file a report with upstream.
> > 
> > Waiting for upstream response if this do not take too much time ...
> > (you can provides a PR for fix the problem ...?)
> 
> 
> https://github.com/jupyter/qtconsole/issues/142
> 
> This is the issue I filed. But, I guess, I can do a PR (based on what reply
> I get).
> 
> I would imagine, since the license is clearly spelled out, this should not
> be a problem?
> 
> > 
> > >  
> > > > 
> > > > [!]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
> > > >  ./qtconsole-4.2.1/examples/jupyter-qtconsole.desktop
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Fixed.
> > 
> > Missing scripts, see
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets#desktop-database
> 
> This is embarassing! :(
> 
> Fixed here.
> https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-
> qtconsole/round3/python-qtconsole.spec
maybe os better:
%post -n python2-%{pypi_name}
/usr/bin/update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || :

%postun -n python2-%{pypi_name}
/usr/bin/update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || :

%post -n python3-%{pypi_name}
/usr/bin/update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || :

%postun -n python3-%{pypi_name}
/usr/bin/update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || :

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]