Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: memcached - High Performance, Distributed Memory Object Cache https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238994 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-09 09:58 EST ------- (In reply to comment #34) > Starting reviews of other packages, completed 246747 - postgresql-ip4r Well, I checked your pre-review and it seems good for initial comments. (In reply to comment #35) > (In reply to comment #32) > > Should it be running as user nobody? I have vague recollection of the rule that > > each process should be running as its own user. > > I'm just starting to read: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserCreation > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry > > These changes appear more involved, and would require > some time to get resolved. I don't recommend fedora-usermgmt (and I don't request you to use it or not to use it...) Okay. ------------------------------------------------------ This package (memcached) is APPROVED by me ------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account" If you want to push this package also on F-7, you also have to check: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT after the URL above. Matthias and Ruben, do you want to co-maintain this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review