[Bug 1372718] Review Request: rubygem-puma - A simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372718



--- Comment #16 from Jun Aruga <jaruga@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
> > *** build.log errors
> >  * In %build section there is
> > ```
> > To see why this extension failed to compile, please check the mkmf.log which
> > can be found here:
> >   /builddir/build/BUILD/puma-3.6.0/usr/lib64/gems/ruby/puma-3.6.0/mkmf.log
> > ```
> > But the .so is packaged. Is this false positive?
> 
> Let me check it.

Hi Pavel,

After asking to the upstream on below page, it looks false positive.

https://github.com/puma/puma/issues/1074

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]