[Bug 1350257] Review Request: petsc - Portable Extensible Toolkit for Scientific Computation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257



--- Comment #25 from Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
I'm still trying to get fedora-review run properly on the current version. 
It's now failing for a different reason that looks like a Fedora bug...

In the meantime, something that needs investigating is that rpmlint reports a
bunch of unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings due to the configured options
apparently not being acted on, like these.  Can you debug that?  (I haven't
tried, and I don't think it happened with the older petsc versions that I'd
worked on.)

petsc64.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libpetsc64.so.3.7.2 /lib64/libhwloc.so.5
petsc64.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libpetsc64.so.3.7.2 /lib64/libhdf5.so.10
petsc64.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libpetsc64.so.3.7.2 /lib64/libquadmath.so.0
petsc64.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libpetsc64.so.3.7.2 /lib64/libstdc++.so.6
petsc64.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libpetsc64.so.3.7.2 /lib64/libgomp.so.1

These issues with what should be a straightforward library must be trying to
tell us something...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]