https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369213 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- Issues: [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 44 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1369213 -python-django-netjsongraph/licensecheck.txt All source files are without license headers. Please, ask to upstream to confirm the licensing of code and/or content/s, and ask to add license headers https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification python-django-netjsongraph.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C Requires: python3-django-rest-framework >= 3.3, python3-django-rest-framework < 3.4 python-django-netjsongraph.noarch: W: tag-in-description C Requires: python-django-netjsongraph.noarch: W: tag-in-description C Requires: python-django-netjsongraph.noarch: W: tag-in-description C Requires: python-django-netjsongraph.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag python-django-netjsongraph.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/tests/manage.py /usr/bin/env python python-django-netjsongraph.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/tests/manage.py 644 /usr/bin/env python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx