Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: avr-libc - C library for use with GCC on Atmel AVR microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241279 j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |trond.danielsen@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2007-07-08 02:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Some remarks: > > * I'd recommend to let the *-docs package put its doc files into > /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-%version > I'm afraid thats impossible, as rpmbuild erases that dir before checking %files: Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.46262 + umask 022 + cd /home/hans/projects/fedora-extras/wip/avr-libc + cd avr-libc-1.4.6 + DOCDIR=/var/tmp/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8-hans/usr/share/doc/avr-libc-1.4.6 + export DOCDIR + rm -rf /var/tmp/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8-hans/usr/share/doc/avr-libc-1.4.6 + /bin/mkdir -p /var/tmp/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8-hans/usr/share/doc/avr-libc-1.4.6 So writing "%doc /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-docs-1.4.6/foo" won't work because if foo was installed there it will be erased. And using %doc foo, will make it end up as /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-docs-1.4.6/foo > * I don't think shipping the man pages in /usr/share/doc/avr-libc-%version/man > is a good idea. It will break avr-man when installing the rpm w/ --exclude-docs > > I'd put them somewhere else, e.g. /usr/share/avr-libc, /usr/avr/share/man or > even /usr/avr/sys-root/usr/share/man. I'd use /usr/avr/share/man. > Here is a new version which moves the manpages to /usr/avr/share/man, Trond any chance you could review this? Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-libc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/avr-libc-1.4.6-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review