https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367569 --- Comment #9 from Giovanni <dacav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hello Parag In reply to Comment 7: 1) Done. I found a bit weird the fact that rpmdev-bumpspec is not using the angular bracket. However I've fixed it manually. 2) I've fixed the README files upstream, however the SPEC file is pointing with Source0 to the archive of version 1.0.3. In order to enable the new README I should bump the version of the whole package and probably re-publish on CPAN too. The same applies to APP::PFT 1.0.5. 3) Thanks for the suggestion. I've used tangerine as suggested, and you will find the updated SPEC (links follow). Just out of curiosity I've checked with mock if the RPM was constructed with the original set of `BuildRequires:`, and it turned out to be feasible nevertheless (the missing `BuildRequires:` were not installed as transitive dependencies!). I think however it's good to be conservative and to rely on the tangerine tool. Finally, I'm currently involved in the review of someone else's package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307271 SPEC: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/dacav/pft/perl-PFT.git/plain/perl-PFT.spec SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/dacav/pft/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00446658-perl-PFT/perl-PFT-1.0.3-4.fc26.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx