https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370239 --- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #3) > I think package name is correct. Also, I think there is no specific > guidelines that says if a package contains some binary/script that uses its > own python library then name it with python prefix. Correct me if i am wrong. Can't find exact link now, but basically if it's library it should be available (if possible) for both py2 and py3. Current spec provides only py3 module. Which is not something completely wrong, but probably should be adjusted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx