https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257 --- Comment #15 from Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to benson_muite from comment #11) > OpenBLAS or ATLAS would be nice. ATLAS, at least as packaged, is a factor of several slower for dgemm on recent x86. (I don't know how much use petsc actually makes of BLAS, and with the Fedora linear algebra mess it may be a lottery whether something else linked against reference BLAS wins.) > Am looking at adding CLBLAS in future - > will there be options to allow users to choose BLAS library being used? There should be, and the default should be the most efficient for the architecture. You can find a workaround at https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/blas-subversion.html which links to orion's proposal for sorting things out which I, or someone else, need to run with now. > Netlib blas is still useful for checking correct results It also has (had) bugs, of course; see the Fedora changelog for one that was uncovered by R, I think. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx