[Bug 245917] Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libtextcat - language guessing library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245917


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-07-06 12:16 EST -------
I'll assume that the libtool build dependency is there for the purposes of this
review.

rpmlint says:
   W: libtextcat-devel no-documentation
which is OK.

This package screws with the compiler flags as noted above.  Frankly I don't
know what gcc does when it sees -O3 -O2 on the command line, but I'll trust
Ralf's assessment above that it doesn't cause problems. Since you're running the
autotools anyway, it should be easy to patch them out but I don't think it's
mandatory.

So I'll approve this, but of course you'll have to add the libtool dependency so
that you can build.

Review:
* source files match upstream:
   5677badffc48a8d332e345ea4fe225e3577f53fc95deeec8306000b256829655  
   libtextcat-2.2.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (assuming libtool is there)
? compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint output is OK.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  libtextcat-2.2-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm
   libtextcat.so.0()(64bit)
   libtextcat = 2.2-4.fc8
  =
   /sbin/ldconfig
   libtextcat.so.0()(64bit)

  libtextcat-devel-2.2-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm
   libtextcat-devel = 2.2-4.fc8
  =
   libtextcat = 2.2-4.fc8
   libtextcat.so.0()(64bit)

* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.  I have no way to test this
   package.
* shared libraries installed; ldconfig is called properly and unversioned .so 
   files are in the -devel package.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets OK (ldconfig).
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers are in the -devel package.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no static libraries.
* no libtool .la files.

APPROVED; just add that libtool dependency.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]