Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967 ------- Additional Comments From rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-06 08:41 EST ------- (In reply to comment #48) > Why not? Many people using arpack do so in static builds. But what needs > to be done is to split of the static lib in arpack-static (when the package > was submitted the guideline did not exist yet). OK, I have no objections to shipping static libs as long as they're in a separate subpackage. > Thanks! It does look a bit awkward that freefem++ ships a patch to two files > as those two files in a tarball within its tarball, and for simplicity's sake > I'll better make a real patch out of it. Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review