[Bug 214967] Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: arpack - Fortran77 subroutines for solving large scale eigenvalue problems


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214967





------- Additional Comments From rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-07-06 08:41 EST -------
(In reply to comment #48)
> Why not? Many people using arpack do so in static builds. But what needs
> to be done is to split of the static lib in arpack-static (when the package
> was submitted the guideline did not exist yet).

OK, I have no objections to shipping static libs as long as they're in a
separate subpackage.

> Thanks! It does look a bit awkward that freefem++ ships a patch to two files
> as those two files in a tarball within its tarball, and for simplicity's sake
> I'll better make a real patch out of it.

Ping?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]