https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368088 --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Fedora review libgnome-games-support-1.1.90-1.fc26.src.rpm 2016-08-18 $ rpmlint libgnome-games-support-1.1.90-1.fc26.src.rpm \ libgnome-games-support \ libgnome-games-support-devel \ libgnome-games-support-debuginfo libgnome-games-support.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgnome-games-support-1.0.so.2.0.1 /lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libgnome-games-support.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgnome-games-support-1.0.so.2.0.1 /lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0 libgnome-games-support.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgnome-games-support-1.0.so.2.0.1 /lib64/libatk-1.0.so.0 libgnome-games-support.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgnome-games-support-1.0.so.2.0.1 /lib64/libcairo-gobject.so.2 libgnome-games-support.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgnome-games-support-1.0.so.2.0.1 /lib64/libcairo.so.2 libgnome-games-support.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgnome-games-support-1.0.so.2.0.1 /lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgnome-games-support-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib libgnome-games-support-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint warnings are harmless and can be ignored + The package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The license text (COPYING.LESSER) is included in %license + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match the sources in the srpm c8232181fd5d82a73377e55caf50a87c libgnome-games-support-1.1.90.tar.xz c8232181fd5d82a73377e55caf50a87c Download/libgnome-games-support-1.1.90.tar.xz + The package builds in koji (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15294834) n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane + locale handling + ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all the directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect the runtime of application n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Development files should be in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a Proper .desktop file handling + Doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages + Filenames are valid UTF-8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx