https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367526 Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #5) > Only brial-devel conflicts with polybori-devel, so at first I > preferred to not create an artificial conflict, as runtimes can > be installed at the same time. But I can add it, as one doing > "serious" work depending on polybori (and not using brial) is > likely not using the system package. [snip] > I can make a new srpm with Obsoletes/Provides for the > "non conflicting" polybori packages, as otherwise they may > sit without use on a system being updated from a previous > sagemath version, but should it also Obsoletes/Provides > the other polybori packages that brial does not (yet) have > an alternative? Those are > polybori-gui > polybori-docs > polybori-static # on purpose there is no alternative > polybori-ipbori Yes, we are going to remove polybori from the distribution, so we shouldn't leave unsupported RPMs on people's machines. So the main brial package should Obsoletes/Provides all of those. If you like, leave yourself a note that the Obsoletes/Provides can all be removed once Fedora 25 reaches EOL. I'm going to approve this package now. You can fix up the Obsoletes/Provides when you import the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx