https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357724 --- Comment #6 from Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Matt Chan from comment #5) > Sorry, I just got back from vacation. Still working through a backlog. I'll > get the corrected specfiles to you on Monday? > > The version number on Qcint is correct according to Qiming. Right now qcint > and libcint have differing version numbers, but he's planning on > synchronizing them in a future major release. > > I have a question related to PySCF (which depends on qcint/libcint) though. > Given that qcint is on x86_64 and libcint is i686/arm, and there's only 1 > release of PySCF for x86_64, i686, and arm, what do I put in the > BuildRequires for PySCF? Or do I build two versions of PySCF, one linked to > qcint, the other to libcint? %ifarch %{ix86} %{arm} BuildRequires: libcint-devel %else BuildRequires: qcint-devel %endif Though I'm not sure about other arches like MIPS, PPC, AArch64, etc. > > Thanks! > Matt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx