Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-05 03:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #64) > Found: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246815 > > Now, what is the best course of action? Should I wait and hope that bug is > fixed soon or work around the problem by, e.g., temporarily disabling the YAP > interface? I guess you want to disable YAP support now, and I also want to have this rebuilt once anyway. (If you want to disable YAP support, write a comment in the spec file like: ---------------------------------------------------------- # disable YAP support on x86_64 until bug 246815 is fixed ---------------------------------------------------------- > > There is a related problem: I had to work around a `pl' > packaging problem due to > a missing dependency on `readline-devel'. > Now this bug has been fixed by the > `pl' maintainer > The question is: should I keep my workaround > or should I remove it and make the > dependency from `pl' stricter, requiring at least > the first version with the fix? Yes, pl dependency for readline-devel is fixed now and you can revert the workaround for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review