https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361687 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limburgher@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |needinfo?(limburgher@gmail. | |com) --- Comment #6 from Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hello Jon! Thanks for fixing the license. The executable names still do not follow the Fedora guidelines I cited. I'll be a little more specific. The spec file currently generates these files: $ ls rpms-unpacked/python2-isort-4.2.5-2.fc26.noarch.rpm/usr/bin/ -l total 4 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 rbarlow rbarlow 17 Aug 9 14:57 isort -> /usr/bin/isort2.7 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 rbarlow rbarlow 292 Aug 9 14:55 isort2.7 $ ls rpms-unpacked/python3-isort-4.2.5-2.fc26.noarch.rpm/usr/bin/ -l total 4 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 rbarlow rbarlow 292 Aug 9 14:55 isort3.5 According to the Python packaging guidelines, it *should* be generating these files: /usr/bin/isort -> /usr/bin/isort-2.7 /usr/bin/isort-2 -> /usr/bin/isort-2.7 /usr/bin/isort-2.7 /usr/bin/isort-3 -> /usr/bin/isort-3.5 /usr/bin/isort-3.5 In particular, this spec file is missing the dashes and the -2 and -3 symlinks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx